Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

Max keiser critiques genius act as ‘fiat slavery’

Max Keiser Critiques GENIUS Act | Calls It ‘Fiat Slavery’

By

Maya Lopez

Jun 23, 2025, 06:37 PM

Edited By

Diego Silva

Updated

Jun 23, 2025, 09:34 PM

2 minutes needed to read

Max Keiser at a podium, passionately discussing the implications of the Genius Act on personal finance and bank control
popular

A growing backlash is gaining traction against the recently proposed GENIUS Act, with Bitcoin advocate Max Keiser taking a firm stand. He argues that the bill actually strengthens the fiat banking system while branding stablecoins as a method of enforcing monetary control, rather than enabling true freedom for users in the digital currency space.

Understanding the GENIUS Act

The GENIUS Act seeks to introduce federal regulations for stablecoins, mandating 1:1 reserves and audits. Supporters claim it enhances consumer protection and integrates stablecoins into the financial system effectively. Critics, however, including Keiser, argue that it deepens the existing fiat control, undermining the goals of decentralized finance.

Key Takeaways from the Community

Input from the crypto community highlights a mix of skepticism and concern:

  • Conflict of Interest: Some commentators suggest that ties between political figures and stablecoin issuers might lead to conflicts of interest, which could skew regulatory intentions.

  • Control Over Currency: There's a belief that this legislation merely allows banks to manipulate funds better, leading to what one commentator described as "printing money without actually printing it."

  • Global Impact: Interestingly, a few people see stablecoins as a lifeline for those in economically struggling nations, providing better access to USD and Euros.

"This might be a crucial opportunity for us millennials before everything collapses," commented one participant, indicating hope amid skepticism.

Sentiment Toward the Act

The general sentiment expressed in forums leans towards negativity, with many feeling that these reforms primarily serve major banks' interests, not those of everyday individuals looking for freedom in their financial transactions.

Sentiment Patterns

  • 💬 "This reinforces the fiat banking system" - echoing concerns from multiple commentators.

  • 🏦 Many see the Act as a step backward in the quest for financial autonomy.

  • 🌎 There is ongoing discussion about the potential benefits for users in developing nations, highlighting a complex perspective.

Finale

The pressure on lawmakers is mounting as more individuals call for alternative solutions and push back against excessive regulation. As this story develops, advocates for cryptocurrency continue to voice concerns, suggesting a long road ahead for the GENIUS Act amidst a rapidly evolving financial environment.