Edited By
Akira Tanaka

A heated debate is brewing among cryptocurrency enthusiasts regarding ICX's absence from Coinbase, a leading exchange. Despite the passage of time, users are left wondering why coins like VET have been listed while ICX remains on the sidelines.
This situation has sparked curiosity and frustration within user boards, with many questioning the potential reasons behind the delayed listing. Several theories are circulating, primarily focusing on demand and transparency from Coinbase.
Comments indicate a general dissatisfaction with Coinbase's lack of clarity regarding its listing process.
"Coinbase has not been transparent with us about it," one person expressed, hinting at potential issues that could be dissuading the exchange from adding ICX.
Some users suspect that higher listing fees could be a contributing factor to ICX's absence. This sentiment suggests that Coinbase might be prioritizing coins that can meet a financial threshold, leaving less popular options in limbo.
The ongoing lack of communication from Coinbase is fueling frustration among ICX supporters.
Another comment noted, "I suspect they tried to fish for an extra massive listing fee??" indicating a feeling that the exchange is potentially taking advantage of market demand.
No Clear Explanation: Many are frustrated with Coinbase's silence regarding ICXβs status.
Possible Financial Roadblocks: Concerns over high listing fees may impede ICX's entry to the exchange.
User Sentiment: A mix of disappointment and suspicion is growing amongst holders and enthusiasts.
Could Coinbase's policies ultimately hinder the growth of promising projects like ICX? As this develops, many will be watching closely for any updates from the exchange.