Edited By
Oliver Brown
PCT's mainnet launch on February 20, 2025, triggered a storm of skepticism among investors. With several unsettling developments, a community of concerned users is speaking out about red flags that seem to signal trouble ahead for the project.
Since launching, PCT seems to have missed key milestones that many projects consider standard. User sentiment has soured significantly, as critical evaluations of the projectβs practices come to light. From a lack of communication to questionable financial maneuvers, investors are left scratching their heads.
Lack of AMA Sessions - Unlike many cryptocurrency projects, PCT did not host any Ask Me Anything (AMA) sessions before their token launch. This absence raised eyebrows; many believe AMAs are essential for transparency.
Dubious Post-Launch Messaging - Just hours after a massive price drop, co-founder "Chengadian" appeared in a video encouraging developers to create dApps, instead of Dr. Nicholas who was notably absent. Fans voiced suspicions about the appropriateness of the timing.
A Shift in Focus to Domain Names - With Pi Day around the corner, Dr. Nicholas suddenly emphasized .pi domains over developing ecosystem dApps. This sudden pivot left many investors feeling ignored and frustrated.
Interestingly, user reactions spanned from outright frustration to reluctant acceptance of the platform's fate. Many echoed concerns about a potential exit scam while some continue to hold on to hope, despite the odds. Quoted sentiment indicates a bitter wind: "Most developers have already quit due to slow progress," remarked one user, underscoring growing dissatisfaction.
The overall mood appears grim, with many users claiming they've lost patience. Some warn that PCTβs reputation is on the line as they struggle to deliver on promises. Users are particularly concerned about the implications of poor management.
While PCT claims to hold substantial assets in coins for project promotion, the lack of visibility of these funds is concerning. Developers have voiced increasing frustration as they depart the project, leaving remaining investors in a lurch.
π¨ No AMA Sessions: Standard practice ignored, causing major transparency concerns.
π Questionable Leadership: Absent co-founders and lack of enthusiasm spark doubts.
β Emphasis on Domains over Development: Shift in focus particularly irking the community.
π€ Developer Exodus: An alarming trend that could spell disaster for PCT.
In the face of dashed hopes and a clouded horizon, PCT's future hangs precariously as community members weigh their options, leaving many to wonder: is it time to move on?
"I quit KYC validation on March 14 and shut down my Super Node today," expressed one frustrated user, encapsulating a prevailing feeling in the community.
As March 14 nears, many users are reflecting on their involvement, tallying losses, and considering new opportunities in a space that moves quickly. For now, the clock ticks on PCTβs viability as a crypto player, and the background murmurs of discontent grow louder.