
A growing coalition of people is frustrated over soaring gas fees on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC), raising questions about the platform's cost legitimacy. Users are increasingly turning to cheaper alternatives like Polygon, leaving BSC's practices under scrutiny.
Commenters highlight a striking price gap. One noted, "I paid $0.10 for a simple swap transaction on BSC, while the same would cost mere cents on chains like Polygon and Arbitrum." Another chimed in, expressing confusion over why fees are higher, questioning, "Honestly, $ isnβt that bad, but when other chains are charging $ it doesn't add up."
Many people attribute the high fees to BSCβs centralized sequencer. Observers argue that it could manipulate transaction costs. As one user pointed out, "They can charge whatever they want." This centralization may allow them to prioritize certain transactions, leading some to wonder if they are profiting at the expense of users.
Critics stress that BSC hasn't made significant tech upgrades. "It stopped actually being cheap back in late 2021," said one commenter. Meanwhile, new networks are emerging as viable alternatives. A user noted, "Thereβs stuff like Super Protocol tapping into confidential compute and even working with Google on BNB." This competition raises concerns about BSCβs long-term viability.
Opinions around BSC remain divided. Early adopters fondly recall lower fees, while newcomers question the current landscape. As options proliferate, users are asking, which chains are genuinely affordable?
πΈ High Fees: Users report significant costs on BSC compared to other chains.
π― Centralization Impact: BSCβs centralized systems could enable fee manipulation.
π Innovation Gap: Lack of tech advancements fuels dissatisfaction among users.
As the crypto space evolves, BSC faces mounting pressure to reassess their fee structure. The crucial question remains: Will they adapt to retain their user base?