SupportXMR Accused of Hash Theft | Users Claim Pool Takes 4% of Their Power
Edited By
Oliver Brown
A prominent user has come forward with allegations against SupportXMR, claiming the mining pool has been siphoning off hash power from contributors. More than 600 hashes per machine were reportedly lost, leading to a heated dispute over the pool’s practices.
Allegations of Thievery Spark Backlash
The claims surfaced after a week of testing the mining pool, where the user noticed significant discrepancies. With 30 machines connected to SupportXMR, this adds up to a considerable loss. The user stated that the stolen hash amounts to over 4%, even factoring in a 1% donation to the pool.
In a discussion with a pool moderator, known as "Wirestripper," the user faced dismissive and insulting remarks, prompting feelings of frustration. "I sent all my evidence, but instead of addressing my concerns, I was banned," the user remarked. This incident has raised questions about the integrity of SupportXMR.
Community Reactions
The community response has been mixed but pointed.
Alternative Pools Highlighted
"P2P pool looks way better, it’s decentralized and 0% fee," noted a supportive commentator.
Defense of Reputation
Another commenter stated, "SupportXMR has a good reputation in the community. You need to provide evidence for your claims."
Official Response Pending
A moderator announcement hints that further clarification may be on the way as the situation develops.
Key Takeaways
🚫 A user claims SupportXMR is taking over 4% of hashing power.
🔍 Alternative pools are gaining attention for their lower fees and better reputations.
📡 "Evidence is crucial," say community members defending SupportXMR's integrity.
The controversy continues to unfold, and many in the crypto mining scene are questioning the practices of pools like SupportXMR. As conversations heat up on various forums, the onus remains on SupportXMR to clarify these serious allegations. Will the community's trust be restored?
"They steal more than 3% of hash per machine. A word to the wise."
This story remains developing, and further information may alter perceptions as the affected users continue to share their experiences.
What Lies Ahead for SupportXMR?
There’s a strong chance that SupportXMR will need to address the allegations thoroughly to regain community trust. As discussions unfold on various platforms, it’s likely the mining pool will either conduct an internal investigation or face pressure to implement transparency measures. Reports of user dissatisfaction can lead to a noticeable shift, with estimates suggesting that as many as 30% of current users may consider moving to alternative pools if the situation remains unresolved. If SupportXMR fails to respond effectively, it risks losing not only its reputation but also its user base.
A Surprising Echo from the Past
In the mid-2000s, a different type of community faced similar challenges when video game platforms began imposing hidden fees and restrictions. Gamers rallied against major publishers after discovering that a portion of their transactions were not transparent, resulting in uproar and eventual migration to independent game developers. Just like today’s crypto mining users, these gamers sought fairness, leading to a renaissance of smaller, independent platforms that emphasized transparency and trust. This situation reflects how community pushback can reshape entire sectors, demonstrating the power people have when they unite against perceived injustices.