Edited By
Raj Patel

A group of TrueNAS users is raising eyebrows over the Sync feature with Storj, expressing confusion over how deleted objects are managed. Discussion around this issue increased on April 25, 2025, sparking debates in forums about retention policies and data management.
At the heart of the matter is the belief that deleted files should vanish after their retention period, but people are discovering that's not the case. Instead, deleted files appear marked but linger in storage, leading to an influx of questions.
Several comments captured the sentiment:
Lack of Lifecycle Rules: "There is simply no way to set a lifecycle rule on the Web interface of Storj," noted one user. This point emphasizes a significant oversight in user functionality.
Delete Markers vs. Actual Deletion: One person pointed out, "With SYNC in TrueNAS, deleted files get a delete marker, but theyβre not removed immediately."
Retention Period Confusion: Users are frustrated with the lack of clarity in documentation. Many feel they misunderstood the retention mechanics.
"Youβre mostly right β actual deletion only happens if retention has expired, or lifecycle rules are in place to clean up versions or delete markers," a response from a knowledgeable source highlighted.
"Without a lifecycle rule, data sticks around even if 'deleted,'" another comment read, reinforcing the need for a solution.
π Users desire better clarity on data lifecycle management.
π Delete markers indicate deletion, but files remain until rules apply.
β³ Need for more comprehensive documentation is evident among community members.
As businesses continue to rely on cloud storage, understanding data management practices becomes crucial. The practices adopted by platforms like Storj might greatly affect operational efficiency. How will these companies address user concerns moving forward?
Stay tuned for updates as this developing story unfolds in the tech community.