By
Chen Wei
Edited By
Dmitry Ivanov
A rising tide of concern looms over stablecoins as experts warn they could ignite a banking crisis reminiscent of 2008. With recent legislation like the Genius Act, which establishes backing and regulations for stablecoins, the financial landscape is set for dramatic changeβraising alarm bells.
Signed into law recently, the Genius Act aims to bring oversight to the volatile world of digital currencies. The act requires stablecoins to be backed by safe assets, namely Treasuries, which proponents claim offers a stable form of money. However, critics, including noted political economist Barry Eichengreen, argue that this could violate the essential principle of a consistent monetary value. Eichengreen warns, "Stablecoins could create problems that mirror the financial panics of the nineteenth century."
Many commentators express skepticism regarding the long-term viability of stablecoins as a reliable alternative to fiat currencies. The potential for foreign capital inflows could fuel excessive risk-taking among banks, raising systemic risk across financial systems.
Proponents tout stablecoins as an innovative component of modern finance, even as detractors suggest their usage remains confined primarily to niche markets. "Nobody is using stablecoins apart from cryptobros on their buggy DeFi exchanges," one comment highlighted.
As capital flows potentially shift from traditional bank deposits to stablecoins, banks may struggle to retain customer funds. Sources indicate that nearly $6.6 trillion in deposits could be at risk, further raising stakes for commercial banks.
"If stablecoins increase in volume, banks might lower lending standards to keep profits up," a concerned commentator stressed.
Interestingly, while many believe the expansion of stablecoins would undermine the dollar's dominance, critics argue that increasing reliance on dollar-backed stablecoins will reinforce its global financial position. In times of crisis, the Federal Reserve remains the only central bank capable of stepping in to stabilize the international economy, thus widening its influence.
β³ The Genius Act may trigger capital flight from traditional banking to stablecoin markets.
β½ Stablecoins might not be as reliable as advertised, increasing volatility in the financial sector.
β» "The probability of a major crisis significantly increased last week" - Mark Copelovitch.
As the landscape evolves in 2025, the ramifications of stablecoin legislation are set to unfold, raising critical questions about the future of money and financial stability. Investors closely watch, wondering if history will repeat itself.
As the implications of the Genius Act sink in, experts forecast a possible shift in how capital flows in the financial sector. Thereβs a strong chance that the banking sector will tighten lending standards amid fears of losing deposits to stablecoin markets, with probabilities estimated around 60% for significant migration of funds into these digital assets. Additionally, the volatility surrounding stablecoins could lead to regulatory momentum, pushing lawmakers to act sooner rather than later. This ever-changing scenario may force banks to innovate rapidly or risk being rendered obsolete by alternative means of currency like stablecoins.
In a surprising parallel, the Gold Rush of the mid-1800s offers a glimpse into the chaotic dynamics of sudden wealth influxes. Just as miners flocked in search of fortune, todayβs investors are drawn to stablecoins, fueled by the potential for rapid profits. The rush, however, brought about overlooked consequences, including economic instability and social shifts that altered the fabric of society. Similarly, the rise of stablecoins has the potential to disrupt our financial systems profoundly, reminding us that the pursuit of wealth can sometimes overshadow the inevitable challenges that arise from rapid change.