Home
/
Technology updates
/
Blockchain innovations
/

Understanding semi private coins: coin join challenges

Semi-Private Coins | Users Discuss CoinJoin Privacy Challenges

By

Maximilian MΓΌller

Apr 25, 2025, 09:36 PM

Edited By

Sofia Rojas

2 minutes needed to read

A graphic showing the CoinJoin process with multiple wallets merging transactions to enhance privacy. Coins are represented as circular symbols interlinking.

A growing number of people are raising concerns about the limitations of CoinJoin services, with several users reporting that their coins remain labeled as semi-private even after multiple transactions. This has sparked a debate on privacy scores and the effectiveness of certain strategies in maintaining anonymity.

What’s the Issue?

Many stakeholders in the crypto community are questioning the semi-private status of their coins after transactions fail to reach the desired privacy threshold. One user noted, β€œI tried CoinJoin for the first time but my coins stuck at 88%.” This raises critical questions about whether these coins can ever achieve full anonymity.

Common Complaints and Insights

Users cited several key themes in their frustrations.

  1. Understanding Privacy Scores

    β€œ88% means some of your coins didn’t reach your anonymity score target,” said one contributor.

    Many people are uncertain about what these scores represent and how they can influence the privacy of their wallets.

  2. Transaction Limitations

    Several participants pointed out that the semi-private label might persist because not enough rounds were participated in. As one user remarked, β€œIf your coins are marked semi-private even with a decent anonymity score, it’s likely due to insufficient participation.”

    This highlights the complexity involved in achieving full privacy in cryptocurrency transactions.

  3. Strategies to Improve Privacy

    There were mixed opinions about how to improve privacy effectively. One remark suggested, β€œYou don't need to wait to be 100% private before using it.” For users wanting to make payments, many believe that satisfactory anonymity can be reached with lower scores, as long as minimum thresholds are met.

What Do Users Really Want?

Many aim for untraceable transactions, with one participant expressing a clear desire:

β€œI’d like to make payments that are untraceable.” This indicates that achieving higher privacy is a priority for many users, while they seem to grapple with the mechanics of achieving it.

Key Points to Note

  • πŸ”’ A significant percentage of coins may not reach privacy targets after CoinJoin transactions.

  • πŸ”„ Participating in more rounds could improve anonymity scores.

  • πŸ₯΅ The desire for untraceable transactions remains a strong motivator for many users in crypto.

As the crypto community continues to shed light on these issues, users remain vigilant and proactive about improving their privacy measures. Will these concerns lead to changes in services offered by CoinJoin providers? Time will tell.