Edited By
Akira Tanaka

A heated debate brews among people regarding the hashrate of the RTX 4080 graphic card. Many are questioning the actual performance metrics for crypto mining, particularly around energy costs versus potential profit. Observers note a wide variance in reported figures, sparking skepticism.
People are weighing in on the efficiency of the RTX 4080 for cryptocurrency mining. While some believe it could be a game changer, others claim the reality is far less profitable. The discrepancies in hashrate reports are causing confusion and debate across forums and user boards.
Profitability Concerns
Several comments highlight the high energy consumption compared to low returns. One person stated, "10 of those GPUs wouldnβt even net 415kh/s. 5 would be more like 8kh/s & using ~1000W of energy."
Performance Comparisons
Some users suggest that traditional CPUs, like the Ryzen 5800X, may outperform high-end GPUs in terms of hashrate, while using far less power.
"For context, you can make more hash rate on a 5800X Ryzen CPU @ ~ 90W of energy."
Alternatives and Strategies
People are pointing towards alternatives like Monero Ocean for mining, arguing that it allows mining other cryptocurrencies and payment in XMR, hinting at a shift toward more sustainable methods in the face of mounting costs in GPU mining.
"Youβll be investing hundreds to make cents."
"Getting ~2kh with a gaming RTX 4080 isnβt impressive at all."
The overall sentiment appears skeptical, focusing primarily on the negative implications of mining with the RTX 4080, especially regarding energy efficiency and financial viability.
β³ Thereβs skepticism regarding profitability, with high energy costs reported.
β½ Many suggest a CPU may outperform GPUs like the RTX 4080 in mining effectiveness.
β» "GPU hashrate on RandomX is low better go for Monero Ocean."
This ongoing debate raises a pivotal question: Is investing in high-end GPUs worth the risk for crypto mining? As energy prices rise, the fate of GPU mining looks increasingly uncertain.