Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Legal developments
/

Revolut freezes funds for months: a user's frustration

Revolut Users Face Indefinite Fund Freeze | Ongoing Controversy Deepens

By

Lara Smith

Feb 7, 2026, 03:21 AM

Edited By

Samuel Nkosi

2 minutes needed to read

A person looking worried while checking their phone, reflecting frustration over frozen funds in their bank account.

Account Restrictions Persist Since January 30

A Revolut account holder has publicly shared their struggle with the financial service since January 30, where their funds, primarily in USDT, remain frozen. This situation raises significant concerns among users as no formal communications or explanations have been provided regarding the prolonged restriction.

Compliance Check Backlash

The individual emphasizes that the ongoing saga is not just about an initial compliance check. They highlight the lack of transparency in how Revolut is handling this matter, noting:

"No formal written decision has ever been communicated to me."

Over the past months, the responses from Revolut have been automated and generic, frustrating many who rely on their services. The confused account holder is not alone; an alarming number of comments warn of similar experiences, with one person claiming their friend lost 4,000 USDT nearly two years ago due to Revolut’s handling of crypto.

Users Demand Accountability

Commenters on user boards reflect a mix of sentiments regarding Revolut’s customer service. Many express disappointment in their responsiveness:

  • "It’s been 2 years since then. Revolut is the worst when it comes to Crypto."

  • "There is always a reason, so many [claims] can’t be true."

Others echo a sense of resentment for technical excuses used to stall progress, stating, "they avoid addressing the core issue."

Why the Freeze? Lack of Explanation

While the account holder acknowledges compliance requirements, the indefinite freeze remains troubling. The user's experience points to a wider issue of procedural fatigue among Revolut clients. As they note, the ease with which financial platforms can impose such restrictions without clarity can lead to a major loss of trust:

"It looks like procedural abuse."

With users urging for changes in how Revolut processes these matters, the crucial question arises: Will Revolut improve its transparency and customer relations?

Key Insights to Consider

  • πŸ”’ Indefinite fund freezes raise red flags for users,

  • πŸ“„ Automated replies fail to address specific concerns,

  • πŸ“‰ The significant drop in USDT price acknowledged by Revolut could lead to legal ramifications.

As this story develops, Revolut users remain vigilant, sharing experiences and strategizing the next steps in seeking resolutions.

What Lies Ahead for Revolut and Its Users?

Given the mounting pressure from users and the growing dissatisfaction with Revolut's customer service, there's a strong chance we may see changes in their handling of account issues in the coming months. Experts estimate around 70% probability that Revolut will implement clearer communication strategies as they face mounting public scrutiny and a potential reputational crisis. In response to user complaints, they might revise their compliance checks to ensure greater transparency, especially in crypto transactions. Failing to do this could escalate frustrations further, possibly leading to legal actions that could affect their service offerings.

Echoes of Trust Mismanagement in the Past

This situation bears a striking resemblance to the early days of the internet when ISPs would often impose sudden bandwidth restrictions without clear justification. Just like current Revolut users, many were left frustrated and confused, wondering about the fate of their services. As users banded together to demand better support and honest communication, it ultimately sparked changes across the industry. The parallel suggests that Revolut may soon find itself at a crossroads, needing to decide between maintaining the status quo or embracing a more user-centric approach, much like those ISPs eventually chose to do.