
A growing concern among people in the crypto community emerges as Pi's value declines sharply, dropping more than 90% from its peak in February 2025. Many are questioning the managementโs silence while it continues to generate revenue through advertisements.
Discussions on various forums highlight the serious challenges faced by Pi. Critics argue its current value is below expectations, yet the team remains silent.
Management's Inactivity: Many in the community are frustrated by the team's lack of communication. "The core team doesnโt talk if they donโt have to," remarked one participant.
Misleading Price Metrics: Some assert the use of the all-time high (ATH) as a reference is deceptive. It turns out, the ATH was influenced by a brief spike due to thin liquidity, leaving the coin vulnerable to a steep sell-off.
Ad Revenue Controversy: Despite losing value, Pi continues to run ads. "Theyโre still making money from everyone on ads,โ emphasized another commentator. Interestingly, a few users suggested that many people remain invested, with one stating, "I have been mining for free and have 20k Pi. For me, itโs free money."
"How can something that was free be a rug pull?" - Comment from the community.
Opinion among people remains divided. While some see potential, others express frustration, particularly about the cumbersome KYC process that stretches for months. A frustrated participant noted, "I want out, but they still havenโt sent me the second migration Pi coins."
๐ป Pi has lost over 90% of its peak value, sparking dissatisfaction.
โ ๏ธ Managementโs silence raises eyebrows amid ongoing ad revenue generation.
๐ฌ "For me, itโs free money, and Iโm not selling yet," shared a participant who remains optimistic.
The crypto community remains watchful as developments unfold. Will the management step up, or will this situation spiral further? Only time will tell.
As the Pi community watches closely, management may need to address growing concerns to prevent further erosion of value. With over 90% loss already, experts suggest a significant probability that urgent updates are necessary to regain user trust. If the team continues to remain silent, many participants may consider legal action or pull their investments. Although ad revenue may sustain operations in the short term, discontent could lead to calls for a more transparent approach. Failure to act might fracture the community, leading to potential migration to more reliable projects.
Phenomena surrounding Pi can echo challenges faced during the launch of early social networks, like Friendster. Once the front-runner, Friendster's rapid rise was marked by initial excitement but ultimately fell victim to technical issues and poor management. The management team's oversight of growing discontent led to a swift decline, serving as a reminder that transparency and active engagement are critical in maintaining community support.