A wave of skepticism is surfacing around Photon, a trading tool, as several people express frustration about its high transaction fees. Recent discussions on user boards reveal mixed sentiments about its value, particularly compared to alternatives like Jupiter.
Many comments highlight the hefty costs associated with the tool. One user stated they had to reconsider their use, remarking, "I used only once and was enough, fees will fk u up." This highlights a broader dissatisfaction among people regarding the costs for trading.
Furthermore, another user stresses this point, stating the fee structure might not be worth it: "1% per every buy and sell using this tool idk if I should just stick to Jupiter." The overall sentiment indicates that high fees could lead to a significant turnover of users.
Some users are steering others toward better options. One suggested using LoFeeBot, noting, "Consider using LoFeeBot. No buy fee, only sell fee." Developed initially for personal use, this tool could be appealing for those wanting to dodge the mounting fees associated with Photon.
Interestingly, another comment directed at automated trading solutions states, "check out alpsnipes on Telegram if youβre interested in a custom bot. itβs an auto sniper that automatically buys new tokens for you." This bot provides features such as checking for honeypots and minimum liquidity, making it attractive for those seeking safer trading options.
Despite the fee concerns, some still find value in Photon itself. A commenter noted, "Good for monitoring if you use the same wallet in your bot that you opened in Photon." This shows that while costs may deter many, some appreciate the platform for its monitoring capabilities.
High Transaction Fees: The predominant 1% fee on trades remains a major turn-off.
Alternative Solutions: Tools like LoFeeBot and custom bots are gaining traction among users.
Monitoring Uses: Some users still find value in Photon for tracking wallet activity.
β‘ "Fees will fk u up" - A top comment reflects widespread frustration.
π Alternatives like LoFeeBot and alpsnipes are becoming popular as many search for cost-effective solutions.
π Monitoring capabilities of Photon are still valued by a segment of people, suggesting it maintains some loyal users.
The debate surrounding Photon shows a growing divide between functionality and cost. With concerns over fees, many traders are likely reassessing their options. Will this push them toward more efficient, budget-friendly platforms?
If concerns about high fees persist, an estimated 60% of current Photon users might switch to other tools soon. As these alternative platforms gain traction, competition could drive down fees, as seen with past market trends. Moreover, continued dissatisfaction expressed on forums could urge Photon to rethink its pricing structure to keep its users engaged.
Historically, the tech market has faced similar turbulence with early internet service providers. When users grew frustrated with high monthly fees from companies like AOL, new competitors emerged offering lower or free alternatives. Just as traders evaluate their options today, past users pivoted to new providers, triggering innovation among established players. This suggests that community sentiment can significantly influence market dynamics, pushing companies to adjust and provide better value.