Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

New york introduces 0.2% tax on digital asset trades

New York's Proposed Tax | 0.2% on Digital Asset Transactions Starting September

By

Maximilian Mรผller

Aug 16, 2025, 07:35 AM

Edited By

Akira Tanaka

3 minutes needed to read

A graphic showing a tax form with a digital asset symbol and New York skyline in the background
popular

A new proposal in New York could impose a 0.2% tax on digital asset transactions starting in September. This controversial move has sparked backlash among crypto enthusiasts and investors, many of whom say it may drive them away from the state.

Public Response is Divided

Residents and people in the crypto community are not shy about their opinions. Comments reveal widespread frustration over what many view as a punitive measure against digital assets. One commenter stated, "Fucking NY, their laws for digital assets already suck; now they want to tax us for transactions." The sentiment points to a growing perception that New York is increasingly hostile toward digital currency.

The Pushback

Three main themes emerged from public feedback:

  • Taxation on Transactions: People express disbelief that a state would tax each transaction, further complicating trading economics already burdened by fees. One user argued, "Tax comes on capital gains at the end of the year, not every transaction. They want a fee per transaction?"

  • Restrictions on Trading: Multiple comments highlighted the stringent trading regulations in New York, with some users frustrated about the need for special licenses to engage in legal trading activity. One person noted, "I love NYC, but the financial laws here are insane."

  • Exodus of Wealth: Many shared feelings of resentment about how policies seem designed to push wealth out of state, claiming, "They really do seem to want to drive out every last person with any money."

Regulatory Pressures Mount

As New York eyes this new tax initiative, tensions in the crypto market continue. The proposed 0.2% tax could hinder trading and lessen the attractiveness of New York as a hub for digital finance. Folks in the crypto world are worried that if the trend continues, "New York will become the least crypto-friendly state."

Key Insights

  • โŒ 0.2% per transaction could burden traders with excessive fees.

  • โš ๏ธ Many crypto holders feel "New York continues to screw us over."

  • ๐Ÿ’ธ Concerns about regulations leading to "an exodus of capital from the state."

As discussions about this proposed tax move forward, it remains to be seen how the legislation will unfold and its potential long-term impacts on New York's financial landscape.

"It's a big club, and we ain't in it." - A memorable remark reflecting the sentiment of many frustrated voices.

What Lies Ahead for New York's Crypto Landscape

Thereโ€™s a strong chance that the proposed 0.2% tax on digital asset transactions will spark an exodus of trading activity from New York, as many traders seek friendlier environments elsewhere. With rising frustration among crypto enthusiasts, experts estimate that up to 20% of active traders may relocate to states with more lax regulations and favorable tax structures within the next year. If these trends persist, we could see New York losing its standing as a crypto hub, affecting local economies and innovation in technology. Should this tax go through, itโ€™s likely that the state's legislative moves could push not just talent, but also considerable financial investment out of the Big Apple.

A Lesson From Prohibition's Aftermath

Looking back, the events surrounding Prohibition provide an intriguing parallel. Just as the nation tried to regulate alcohol sales, driving businesses underground and fostering a black market, New Yorkโ€™s digital asset tax could inadvertently encourage similar responses in the crypto space. In the 1920s, rather than curbing consumption, restrictive laws amplified underground activity. Today, heavy taxation could push crypto trading into less regulated areas or even overseas. History shows that over-regulation often backfires; it could be a costly lesson if lawmakers do not tread carefully as they craft these policies.