Home
/
Investment strategies
/
Portfolio management
/

Mstr's disappointing portfolio performance compared to spy etf

MSTR Performance | Gains Under Fire Amid Controversy

By

Maximilian Mรผller

Jun 25, 2025, 11:33 PM

Edited By

Sofia Rojas

3 minutes needed to read

A graph showing MSTR's disappointing portfolio performance against SPY ETF, highlighting low Bitcoin returns since 2020.
popular

A growing sentiment among financial analysts is raising eyebrows regarding MicroStrategy's Bitcoin investments. CEO Michael Saylor recently boasted about a $9 billion paper gain year-to-date from the company's BTC holdings, but skeptics argue that the numbers donโ€™t paint the full picture.

Michael Saylorโ€™s Claims Under Scrutiny

Saylor touted a substantial profit from MicroStrategy's ~592,300 BTC holdings, acquired at prices between $70,000 and $71,000. However, with Bitcoin trading lower, analysts suggest the companyโ€™s annualized profit since 2020 stands only at approximately 4.5%. As one comment starkly puts it, โ€œIt would have been more profitable just to buy the SPY ETF.โ€

Growing Concerns Over Bitcoin Volatility

Critics express fears about the sustainability of Saylor's strategy. One user remarked, "People need to realize multiple crypto firms imploded in the last bear market. This time itโ€™ll be even more spectacular." The undercurrent suggests that MicroStrategy's reliance on Bitcoin makes it particularly vulnerable to market swings, raising questions about its long-term viability.

Are Saylor's paper gains just fluff? With a dilution of common stock by 156% since 2020, investors are feeling the pinch. A prevailing view in user boards is that the financial model might crumble if enthusiasm diminishes.

"A hell of a lot of people are going to get burnt just as they had last time," cautioned another commenter.

Diverging Paths: MSTR vs. Bitcoin

Analysts note a disconnect between MicroStrategy and Bitcoinโ€™s market behavior, as indicated in user discussions. While projections show a return of 47.2% on Bitcoin holdings since 2020, comparably, the SPY ETF returned 98% in that same timeframe. This has led to sentiments of skepticism surrounding how well Saylor can liquidate these assets without significant losses.

Key Insights from the Discussion

๐Ÿ”น Profit from MSTR's Bitcoin holdings appears inflated due to volatile market conditions.

๐Ÿ”น Investors are concerned about MSTR's long-term sustainability amid rampant crypto fluctuations.

๐Ÿ”น โ€œExtreme greed, euphoria, and flat-out idiocy will inevitably reign supreme,โ€ warns a veteran trader reflecting on past market collapses.

What Lies Ahead?

The debate continues: Can MicroStrategy maintain its traction in a landscape littered with past failures? With the risks mounting and returns diminishing, Saylor's reign could face fierce challenges should the market shift unfavorably. As one commenter sagely notes, โ€œWhen this house of cards collapses, BTC will definitely follow.

Forecasting MSTR's Future in a Crypto-Fueled Economy

With mounting skepticism surrounding MicroStrategy's Bitcoin strategy, many analysts predict turbulent times ahead for the firm. Investors may face increased volatility as Bitcoin's performance continues to fluctuate. There's a strong chance we could see a significant decline in MicroStrategy's stock if market trends shift negatively. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that Saylor's claims of profit could result in real losses in the coming months, especially if investor enthusiasm wanes. This environment of uncertainty raises questions about MicroStrategy's long-term viability and whether it can sustain its current investment strategy amid growing crypto market scrutiny.

Echoes of History Amidst Financial Turmoil

This scenario bears a striking resemblance to the dot-com bubble of the late '90s. Back then, many tech firms touted inflated profits driven by internet enthusiasm, only to face steep declines when reality set in. Like those companies, MicroStrategy's bullish projections on Bitcoin might be riding a similar wave of overexcitement. Investors could find themselves caught in another financial whirlwind, sparking calls for due diligence and the need to reassess the fundamentals rather than chasing market hype.