Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Compliance guidelines
/

Centralized exchanges under fire for liquidation undercounts

Centralized Exchanges | Users Raise Alarm Over Liquidation Reporting Issues

By

Dylan Harris

Oct 13, 2025, 09:45 PM

Edited By

Maxim Petrov

Updated

Oct 14, 2025, 11:35 PM

2 minutes needed to read

Graphic showing a trading chart with red arrows indicating liquidation losses, symbolizing concerns over centralized exchanges
popular

Tension in the crypto world is mounting as centralized exchanges face increasing accusations of misrepresenting liquidation numbers. This uproar follows user dissatisfaction during recent market fluctuations, especially highlighted by a major flash crash.

The Backlash Against Centralized Exchanges

Hyperliquid CEO Jeff Yan is vocal in his criticism, specifically targeting Binance. He asserts that their reporting methods can grossly undercount liquidations by only reflecting the latest figures each second. Yan stated, "This reporting method can skew user strategy during mass liquidations."

As feelings run high among people, one commented, "Binance is such a scammy company. Their entire business relies on using their retails as goats to slaughter. Steer clear." Such sentiments reflect the heightened distrust towards centralized exchanges.

CoinGlass supported Yan’s allegations, noting that Binance's reporting shortcomings became evident during the chaotic market event. While Binance claimed their systems held strong, many users expressed frustration that their data felt inconsistent and inaccurate.

Implications for the Crypto Community

Following the flash crash, Binance announced a compensation plan for impacted users amounting to $280 million. This effort seems to stem from a desire to regain user confidence amidst the rising doubts about their practices.

Community voices delivered a mixed chorus of criticism:

  • 🚨 "The implications of underreported data can be damaging in volatile markets."

  • πŸ“‰ "How can users plan effectively when data is inconsistent?"

  • πŸ”’ "Yeah, but it rugpulls and/or gets hacked more."

The need for transparency and reliable reporting is now more pressing than ever. Users are shifting their focus towards decentralized finance (DeFi), echoing a belief that these options can offer a more trustworthy alternative.

Key Points of Discussion

  • πŸ’¬ Hyperliquid’s CEO slams Binance's liquidation reporting practices.

  • πŸ’° Binance committed to compensating users with $280 million but is under scrutiny for data accuracy.

  • πŸ“‰ The community advocates for the reliability of DeFi over traditional exchanges.

The ongoing discourse raises a critical question: Will centralized exchanges adapt their reporting methods to regain trust, or will they remain mired in controversy?

Anticipated Changes in the Crypto Sphere

With community demands for change intensifying, centralized exchanges are expected to grapple with pressing calls for enhanced transparency. Experts speculate significant reforms may emerge within six to twelve months, which might include clearer communication regarding liquidation methods and improved data accuracy. Should Binance consider the voices of their community, a shift toward trust restoration could prevent a mass migration to decentralized alternatives.

Historical Context

The current challenges in the crypto market may remind many of the stock market's early regulation days after the 1929 crash. Investors back then faced similar trust crises, which birthed regulatory bodies like the SEC. As the crypto landscape continues to develop, it will be interesting to see how this sector responds to similar demands for checks and balances, which could redefine trading platform operations.