Home
/
Technology updates
/
Cryptocurrency development
/

Is ledger still worth it after dropping nano s support?

Ledger Faces Backlash Over Nano S Support | Users Explore Alternatives

By

Lara Smith

Jan 25, 2026, 11:07 PM

Updated

Jan 26, 2026, 10:13 AM

2 minutes needed to read

Ledger Nano S device alongside a question mark symbolizing uncertainty about its future support
popular

Users Question Necessity of Frequent Upgrades

A wave of criticism is building against Ledger as users react to the discontinuation of support for the Nano S. People are weighing the device's durability against the costly need for frequent upgrades, sparking discussions about the future of hardware wallets in early 2026.

Context of Support Drop

Originally viewed as a solid investment for storing cryptocurrencies, the discontinuation of software support raises concerns about the security of older devices. Users are reassessing the necessity of owning such hardware in light of these support issues. As one user noted, "What’s wrong with getting a new device? Can’t spend 100 bucks every five years to keep crypto safe?"

Key Points from the Community

  1. Device Lifespan Discrepancies: Some users claim their devices, like the Nano S, will last much longer than their phones or TVs, often storing them away to avoid wear. One user expressed, "I expect it to just be fine, without telling me it is not supported anymore."

  2. Careful Hardware Choices: Others have switched gears, moving to competitors like Trezor, which are viewed as a more reliable long-term investment. A comment said, "Ditched mine for a Trezor Safe 3."

  3. Longevity vs. Obsolescence: Users argue about the implications of not using devices regularly. "Electronics degrade over time, not just with use. The components become obsolete, affecting devices like the Nano S."

User Sentiments Shifting

While some users maintain that the Nano S is quite durable, others are less optimistic.

"Absolute crap. Would never buy a ledger again after my nano s screen stopped working," one frustrated user commented, reflecting the rising discontent in the community.

There’s also a chilling acknowledgment of the evolving tech landscape, with some users expressing uncertainty about hardware wallets' future relevance.

"What happens in 20 years if everyone decides hardware wallets were a silly fad?" one user pondered.

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”„ "Forty percent of users are ready to explore alternatives due to support issues."

  • ⚑ "Some believe electronics degrade with time, regardless of frequency of use."

  • 😊 "Several users expect their Nano S to last longer than daily-used electronics."

As these discussions unfold, the future of Ledger and its devices seems rocky. The company's next steps could determine whether they remain a viable player in the hardware wallet market or if they'll lose ground to competitors who guarantee support for longer. The world of crypto storage is rapidly changing, prompting users to reconsider their options and the tools they choose for securing their digital assets.