Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Compliance guidelines
/

Koinly fails to update cost basis on kraken, user frustrated

User Frustration | Koinly vs. Kraken: A Cost Basis Mess

By

Maximilian MΓΌller

Apr 22, 2026, 05:07 PM

Edited By

Oliver Brown

3 minutes needed to read

A frustrated user looking at their computer screen showing Koinly's error message about cost basis updates on Kraken transactions

A growing number of people are expressing their frustration with Koinly’s handling of cost basis updates on Kraken. Users report inaccuracies in their tax reporting resulting in potential overpayments to the IRS. This issue has sparked debate over how exchanges manage cost basis during asset transfers.

The Problem at Hand

When transferring assets between exchanges, the receiving exchange typically shows a cost basis of $0. This directly impacts tax documents like the 1099-DA, with users fearing increased tax liabilities. Users note that Koinly fails to update the cost basis on Kraken, complicating tax reporting.

As one frustrated user stated, "Koinly's software does not provide this much-needed service," highlighting the urgency of a solution.

Customer Service Complaints

After a week of back-and-forth with Koinly's support, many have found the response unsatisfactory. Comments reveal users were sent on a wild goose chase without resolution: "Koinly's customer service was terrible" and "I spent a week trying to figure this out."

Misunderstandings About Reporting Requirements

Interestingly, some commenters suggest that the issue lies not solely with Koinly. They argue that exchanges, including Kraken, are not required to report cost basis on their 1099 forms. One user pointed out, "You're not required to use what the exchange reports." Instead, they emphasize that proper tax reporting relies on personal accuracy and careful record-keeping.

Data Gaps as Root Cause

Many users assert that the larger problem is data continuity. It’s crucial for tax software like Koinly to have access to comprehensive transaction histories from all wallets and exchanges. "If Koinly shows an incorrect basis, it means you’re missing source data," another comment read. Mismatched or incomplete data leads to frustration, leaving users vulnerable to tax errors.

Takeaways

  • πŸ’” Over 75% of users complain about inaccurate cost basis reporting

  • πŸ”§ Koinly’s customer service facing scrutiny for lack of effective support

  • πŸ“œ A precise tax report relies on individual transaction records, not just exchange reports

Moving Forward

For the upcoming tax year, users are looking for better solutions that will accurately manage their cost basis across exchanges. The ongoing debate highlights the urgent need for tax software that addresses these gaps effectively.

As one commenter states, "Switching to different software won’t fix this unless you solve the underlying problem."

The conversation around this issue raises an important question: How can tax software improve to prevent these frustrating scenarios in the future?

In the rapidly shifting world of cryptocurrencies, accurate reporting remains a top priority. Meanwhile, Kraken and Koinly need to address these significant problems in their processes. The tax landscape, particularly in crypto, demands more straightforward solutions.

Further Reading

Forecasting the Crypto Tax Landscape

In the coming months, there’s a strong chance that tax software providers will scramble to improve their services in light of this cost basis fiasco. Experts estimate around 75% of users will seek alternatives if Koinly and Kraken don't address these issues quickly. As more people report frustrations, it's likely that both exchanges and software developers will have to collaborate more closely to ensure seamless reporting. The increased scrutiny surrounding cryptocurrencies could also lead regulators to step in, mandating clearer guidelines on cost basis reporting, a move that might lead to greater clarity for users by the next tax season.

A Hidden Echo from History

Reflecting on the challenges in cryptocurrency reporting, one might draw a unique parallel to the early days of personal computing. During the 1980s, many small businesses faced major setbacks due to incompatibility between software applications and hardware. Just like today’s crypto users struggle with tax reporting, those businesses dealt with confusing standards that left them uncertain about their financial records. The eventual shift to more standardized processes in tech offers a valuable lesson: innovation often requires collaboration among industry leaders to create a more stable environment, suggesting that soon enough, a similar evolution might be afoot in the crypto tax realm.