Edited By
Akira Tanaka
A recent shake-up in Sorare's gameplay options has left many questioning the value of the free-to-play (F2P) experience. While a few players still advocate for its merits, others express disappointment over lost features and reduced rewards.
Sorare's removal of rivals and the teambuilder function requiring at least four common cards has stirred debate among its community. The question now is whether continuing to play for free is worthwhile, especially as comments range from supportive to skeptical.
Several comments provide insight into player sentiment:
F2P Option Still Benefits: "They have a f2p option in each sport," acknowledges one player, suggesting that the basic functions remain intact.
Frustration Over Rewards: Another player grumbled, "The only stuff I can win is common essence, whatโs the point of playing if you get smth useless?" This highlights ongoing frustrations regarding competitive rewards.
Gameplay Enjoyment Matters: "You can still win stuff through the gameweek missions," stated a supporter, implying that enjoyment should outweigh financial incentives.
"Legitimately the best way to play SoRare F2P is the โNo Card Entryโ feature," one player noted, emphasizing that rewards can still be significant.
While there are voices praising the ongoing F2P options, many feel disheartened by the recent changes. Some believe that Sorare might enhance its offerings post-summer. "I think sorare will add more price cards" hints at possible improvements, but whether they suffice remains to be seen.
โณ Current F2P gameplay remains accessible in various sports.
โฝ Players express frustration over perceived low-value rewards.
โป "The only stuff I can win is common essence" - A key concern among players.
The changes to Sorare are stirring discussions across forums, and the community is divided on whether the F2P model is still engaging or in need of revival. It's a growing conversation that might shape future gameplay strategies.