Home
/
Technology updates
/
Decentralized applications
/

Comparing haveno and openmonero: pros and cons

Haveno vs Openmonero | Examining User Experiences in Crypto Transactions

By

Keiko Tanaka

Apr 29, 2025, 07:47 PM

Edited By

Laura Chen

2 minutes needed to read

A side-by-side comparison of Haveno and Openmonero platforms showcasing their key features and transaction speeds.

A recent transaction user review of Haveno against Openmonero highlights varying experiences in peer-to-peer cryptocurrency exchanges. While the former shows promise in decentralization, it struggles with slow transaction speed, fueling user discussions about trust and efficiency in crypto trading.

Key Insights: Transaction Experience

The transaction process on Haveno involved a security deposit of 15% and a wait for 10 blocks, resulting in a slower experience compared to Openmonero. This has raised questions among users about the necessity of these measures, especially given the varying speed of transactions across platforms.

"It was a smooth enough experience, albeit a bit slower than Openmonero,” one user noted, pointing out both platforms' trade-offs.

Decentralization vs Speed

Haveno takes the lead in decentralization, operating without a central authority. This allure attracts users wary of centralized entities, as one commenter pointed out, "I don't think anyone should trust a centralized entity with a profit incentive." Contrarily, Openmonero promises speed, requiring only a browser to transact, making it more accessible even on mobile devices.

Seller Landscape

User remarks indicate that Openmonero currently holds a broader selection of trading offers. However, a significant portion (around 80%) comes from just a dozen sellers.

"For now, Openmonero seems to have more offers,” a participant observed, sharing concerns about market concentration.

User Trust and Potential

Discussions on reliability and trust in the platforms show a polarized sentiment. With questions lingering about arbitrator trustworthiness in specific exchanges, users seek assurance in their trading choices.

One participant remarked, "Can a Haveno arbitrator be trusted more than an Openmonero one? No clue."

Key Takeaways

  • πŸ”„ Haveno: Slower transactions but higher decentralization.

  • ⚑ Openmonero: Faster, browser-based access, with a wider offer base.

  • πŸ›‘οΈ Users question trust in arbitrators across both platforms.

Looking Forward

Both platforms present unique advantagesβ€”Haveno with its decentralized model and Openmonero with swift transactions. Interested traders might find it beneficial to explore both options while waiting for potential developments like a Haveno app or boosted advertising efforts.

Given these insights, the essential question remains: How will emerging user preferences shape the future of decentralized and centralized trading platforms in the crypto space?