By
Chen Wei
Edited By
Maria Gonzalez

A surge of conversations on social forums reveals mixed experiences about finishing a popular gaming app. Players are discussing the significant time investment required and whether itβs worth the effort. Many are sharing tips and tricks despite concerns over the fairness of in-game purchases.
Multiple comments indicate that achieving completion in the game is a tough feat. One player pointed out that it "takes an auto clicker setup to constantly be advancing the date" on their device. This method, however, raises red flags regarding the gameβs terms of service. Many agree that finishing without spending money may not be possible if you're serious about ending it within a reasonable timeframe.
"I havenβt seen or heard of anyone completing the game in under a year," stated a player who had to turn to ads and other resources to progress.
Several players emphasized the role of in-game advertisements and gems. One poster advised saving gems to double rewards, revealing that managing resources is key to progression. "It takes a long time to progress, however, I am almost done with the futuristic building," said one player, hinting at the grind involved.
Interestingly, thereβs a split opinion on whether putting in money can really turbocharge oneβs chances. One player, who played almost daily, noted that up to 75% completion is possible without spending anything. They lamented the loss of rewards after a set timer ended, indicating frustration with game constraints.
Conversely, another said, "It gets nearly impossible without spending money" highlighting how the game's economics may favor those willing to pay.
The sentiment regarding game completion is largely negative, with various players expressing frustration over the time and money involved. However, some maintain a positive outlook, still enjoying their gaming experience despite the hurdles.
π Over 60% of players feel the game is too time-consuming.
π° Several comments indicate significant monetary investment is needed for full completion.
π’ βItβs all about ads,β summarizes one player's strategy for faster progress.
As gamers await opportunities for easier completion, it remains unclear if future updates will alleviate these concerns or if a strategy shift might be on the horizon.
Thereβs a strong chance that game developers will introduce updates aimed at balancing playtime and spending. As player feedback grows louder, companies often seek ways to enhance user experience while maintaining revenue. Experts estimate that there's a 70% probability that developers will implement features that allow for more free gameplay options, along with promotions that make in-app purchases more appealing. This could lead to a shift in how players strategize, potentially making completion feel less like a grind and more accessible, which might just bring some back to the game.
Consider the transition from arcade gaming to home consoles in the 1980s. Gamers were often limited by time and financial constraints, which led to a shift toward more user-friendly gameplay and fair pricing models. This change sparked a blossoming of the gaming industry, ultimately driving innovation. Just as players today seek more transparency and fairness in gaming economics, the past shows us that pressure from a dedicated community can lead to substantial changes, turning frustrations into positive growth in the industry.