Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

France's controversial 1% tax on unrealized gains explained

France | Plans 1% Tax on Unrealized Gains, Including Bitcoin

By

Nina Petrova

Nov 6, 2025, 02:21 PM

Edited By

Priya Narayan

3 minutes needed to read

Illustration showing a person looking at a chart depicting rising asset values with symbols for Bitcoin, jewelry, and real estate around them.
popular

French lawmakers have taken a bold step towards implementing a new tax model that impacts wealth like never before. A recent measure proposes a 1% annual tax on assets not just limited to real estate but spanning across non-productive wealth, including cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. Supporters tout it as a chance to boost investments in productive sectors, while critics fear it might hit savers hard.

With the aim of replacing an existing property wealth tax, this new proposal applies to a range of high-value assets such as jewelry, art, and yachts. The flat 1% tax will apply even to assets that havenโ€™t been sold. Critics argue this may penalize savers and draw comparisons to the previously abolished ISF wealth tax from 2017.

A Divided Response

Opinions on this proposed tax are sharply divided. Some worry about its implementation:

โ€œHow they gonna tax cold storage?โ€

This question underscores concerns regarding cryptocurrenciesโ€™ growing adoption and their treatment under tax law. The topic of cold storage and unhosted wallets looms large, as people question how the government plans to enforce compliance.

Many users feel this is indicative of deeper issues facing the French economy. One user commented:

โ€œThis is what happens when your government is not the world reserve currency.โ€

The sentiment reveals concern about the governmentโ€™s need for revenue to balance books and its implications on the working class.

Concerns Over This New Measure

As people grapple with the potential changes, fears emerge about moving wealth out of the country. One comment states,

โ€œPeople will just move out of the country to not pay this stupid tax.โ€

The apprehensions do not just end with cross-border moves; users worry about market volatility as taxes on unrealized gains could force sales. The implications for stock markets, particularly in Paris, seem grim. One user remarked:

โ€œGood luck Paris stock market, youโ€™re going to need it.โ€

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ 1% tax on unrealized gains threatens all non-productive assets, including Bitcoin.

  • ๐Ÿ” Ongoing fears about how taxes will be enforced in relation to crypto storage.

  • ๐Ÿšช Many anticipate relocating to escape potential burdens caused by the new tax system.

This developing story sheds light on Franceโ€™s efforts to reshape its tax landscape. As Parliament debates the measure, concerns about its impact and the fate of wealth could spark further protests from the public.

Repercussions of Taxing the Untouched

The implementation of a 1% tax on unrealized gains is likely to create significant market shifts in France. Economic experts estimate thereโ€™s a strong chance that investors and affluent individuals may seek quick exits to avoid the tax, potentially transferring assets to more favorable jurisdictions. This could lead to a notable decrease in investment in the local economy, as people might convert assets into cash or other currencies to navigate the new tax landscape. Additionally, with concerns over enforcement, particularly regarding cryptocurrencies, the government may face substantial challenges in collecting this tax. Should this strategy falter, a backlash could prompt Parliament to reconsider or amend the proposal, especially if public protests grow in response to diminished economic confidence.

A Lesson from the Luxury Tax of the 1990s

Looking back, the luxury tax enacted in the U.S. during the early 1990s provides an intriguing parallel. Similar to the proposed French tax on unrealized gains, it targeted high-value items, including yachts and expensive vehicles, under the belief that it would generate revenue from the wealthy. However, the outcome was quite different. Sales significantly plummeted, and rather than filling the coffers, the tax backfired and harmed the very markets it intended to capitalize on. As a result, revenue fell short, leading to its repeal not long after introduction. This historical misstep serves as a cautionary tale for French lawmakers, illustrating how taxing wealth can sometimes lead to unintended consequences that undermine economic stability.