Home
/
Market trends
/
Historical price trends
/

Why the 4 year cycle is a misguided belief in trends

Crypto's 4-Year Cycle: Belief or Reality?| Users Debate its Future

By

Keiko Tanaka

Feb 11, 2026, 07:23 PM

3 minutes needed to read

A visual representation showing contrasting trends in market prices over years, highlighting the instability of the 4-year cycle in predictions
popular

A growing debate over the viability of the 4-year cycle in crypto is heating up, as many people are now questioning its relevance. Some claim it’s fueled by the Bitcoin halving, while others see it as outdated thinking. Citing historical precedents, the conversation touches on evolution in technology and market dynamics.

The Halving: Is it the Only Factor?

Many commenters argue that the cycle is rooted in the Bitcoin halving, which happens every four years. However, others suggest that this explanation oversimplifies the complexities of crypto markets. As one person put it, "Most of the comments don't even acknowledge halving, but that's exactly what drives the cycles." While halving events have traditionally led to bullish trends, the rise of derivative markets complicates matters significantly.

"Price action is one thing; halving and mining are another."

This sentiment reflects a growing awareness that the market's reliance on past patterns may no longer hold true in the face of rapid technological change.

The Changing Landscape

Commentators have pointed out that some significant shifts in market dynamics have occurred recently. For example, holding companies, such as MicroStrategy, have started accumulating Bitcoin despite changing miner rewards. This trend raises questions about future price trajectories and market stability. "The halving isn’t relevant to prices anymore," said one commenter, highlighting concerns about how perceived cycles may simply be self-fulfilling prophecies.

Investor Sentiment and Market Psychology

The idea of waiting for a bottom price point in October 2026 has sparked discussions among investors. While some see it as a guaranteed win, critics argue that such predictability might be overly simplistic. As one individual stated, "If a 100% gain was guaranteed every four years, nobody would ever sell." The notion that many people may rush to buy at the same time is likely also complicating decision-making for potential investors.

Quotes from the Community

  • "Belief is all we have in these testing times."

  • "The smart people are buying now; the fools are listening to fear."

Key Takeaways

  • β–³ The 4-year cycle's future is uncertain, with many believing it's tied to halving events.

  • β–½ Derivatives are altering traditional price dynamics, making past patterns unreliable.

  • β€» "The landscape is not the same as it was 4-10+ years ago."

While history provides some insights, the evolving tech and market forces suggest that previous cycles may no longer dictate future actions. Interestingly, the debate continues, leaving many to wonder what the future holds for cryptocurrency.

What Lies Ahead for Crypto?

There's a strong chance that the crypto market will face increased volatility as new dynamics come into play. With the rise of derivative markets and institutional players like MicroStrategy accumulating Bitcoin, traditional patterns may not hold as they once did. Community sentiment suggests that while some will act on historical cyclical behavior, others will adopt a wait-and-see approach, estimating around a 60% probability that price movements will be influenced more by technological advancements than by past trends. The outcome could see a deepening divide among investors β€” those clinging to the past and those embracing the rapid evolution of the market.

A Lesson from the World of Music

Consider the evolution of music genres in the 1980s. As synthesizers rose in popularity, traditional rock bands faced a dilemma: adapt or risk fading into irrelevance. The same way artists reinvented themselves shaped a new landscape of sound, crypto's future lies in adapting to new market realities. Instead of clinging to four-year cycles, market players need to embrace disruption and innovation, much like musicians who embraced technology to reach wider audiences. In both scenarios, those who resist change face obsolescence, while those who embrace it could flourish.