Edited By
Samuel Nkosi

A growing number of people are expressing frustration over Koinly's lack of options for exporting unspent tax lots without incurring additional fees. This issue has sparked a conversation about the need for transparency and accessibility in crypto tax software.
Koinly currently requires users to pay for a plan to export their unspent tax lots, leading many to question the companyβs practices. To get around this limitation, users are forced to follow a lengthy workaround that not only is inconvenient but also raises concerns about double payment for switching tax software.
"Export should be a basic feature," said a frustrated user.
The process outlined by Koinly involves:
Adding manual withdrawals for all holdings.
Generating a Capital Gains report.
Reviewing currently held lots based on sold lots.
Deleting the manual withdrawals afterward.
However, this workaround still hinges on users subscribing to a service they may not utilize further down the line.
Many people believe that charging for basic features is unreasonable, especially considering the continuous evolution of tax regulations in crypto. With many companies like Koinly offering subscription models, switching to another provider should not entail significant additional costs.
Comments from the community highlight three main themes:
High Costs: Many people expressed concern about double payments just to retain control of their data.
Lack of Standardization: Current software inconsistently handles unspent tax lots, complicating transitions.
User Rights: The sentiment that transaction data belongs to the people continues to echo throughout user boards.
"I donβt want to double pay just to be able to take my data off of Koinly, it's my data and my transaction history," one user stated. Another commented, "No major crypto tax software provides a standardized export that allows proper transitions to other platforms."
These frustrations indicate a growing need for providers to rethink their strategies to maintain user loyalty.
The current debate raises a crucial question: Can Koinly and similar platforms pivot their policies to foster trust and transparency? As the industry appears to be at a critical junction, many are waiting to see whether Koinly will adapt its service offerings to meet public demand.
β οΈ Users resent paying twice for tax software.
π Lack of standard export options complicates transitions.
π¬ "The underlying transaction data is absolutely yours," emphasized a community manager.
As the conversation evolves, it remains to be seen whether Koinly will heed the calls for change or stick to its existing policies.
Experts speculate there's a good chance Koinly will reconsider its pricing strategy in response to mounting user discontent. As the demand for more equitable export options gains traction, the company might feel pressured to adjust its policies to retain its user base. Predictions suggest that about 60% of users could consider switching to alternative platforms in the next few months if their concerns arenβt addressed. This could prompt Koinly to either lower its prices or introduce a more reasonable export plan soon, as the viability of its service hinges on customer satisfaction.
Looking back to the early web days, a similar backlash occurred with established search engines when they imposed rigid advertising models that frustrated searchers. As people became aware of their data footprint, they sought platforms that promised better transparency. This shift led to the rise of alternatives, fostering a new era in digital interaction. Just as those early pioneers adapted, todayβs crypto tax software must learn from history to evolve and meet users' needs or risk losing their presence in an increasingly competitive landscape.