Edited By
Fatima Al-Farsi

The release of a new non-skill-based mini game is stirring significant controversy among players, raising questions about its fairness. Scheduled for launch soon, the game has many assessing whether it will reward luck rather than skill.
Some players expressed frustration over the gameโs reliance on chance. One commenter dismissed it as โdumb afโ and argued that a strategy-based game would have been a better choice. Another echoed that "this is a complete luck based game" and foresaw top players struggling if they faced bad luck.
Interestingly, there are others who believe this new approach could change the competitive landscape. One user speculated, "this is going to reward differently than the other mini games", suggesting that it could offer a fresh experience.
Luck vs. Skill: A common thread in comments revolves around the conflict between traditional skill-based gameplay and this new luck-driven format.
Potential for Frustration: Many gamers voiced concern that the leaderboardโs outcome might frustrate top players, especially if luck plays a significant role.
Expectations of Reward Structures: Thereโs speculation that the game's design will distinctly differentiate it from existing mini games, suggesting that rewards may not align with traditional performance metrics.
โI can see a lot of top players in the US complaining about itโ โ a user predicted, highlighting concerns about game fairness.
Overall, sentiments about the new game lean negative among experienced players who favor skillful competition. Meanwhile, a smaller faction seems cautiously optimistic about the potential for a new user experience.
๐ซ Frustration over game design, with many calling it poorly thought-out.
๐ฒ Shift from skill-based to random chance raises eyebrows.
๐ Changes could impact competitive dynamics, affecting top player rankings.
As the community awaits the gameโs release, players are left to ponder whether good luck will be a better ally than skill in this upcoming mini game.