Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

The 36% trap: dutch tax on bitcoin hits profits hard

The 36% Trap | Dutch Tax on Bitcoin Sparks Financial Fears

By

Kimberly Lee

Feb 15, 2026, 01:23 PM

Edited By

Dmitry Ivanov

3 minutes needed to read

Illustration showing a Bitcoin symbol with a tax percentage symbol, depicting the financial loss from a high tax rate on profits.

A new tax proposal in the Netherlands threatens to transform paper profits from cryptocurrency into significant financial losses for many investors. This tax, applied to unrealized gains, has stirred outrage among everyday people who feel targeted by what they describe as an unfair and burdensome policy.

How the Tax Works: A Real-World Scenario

Under the proposed "Box 3" tax, if an investor's portfolio value increases, they will owe taxes on those gains, regardless of whether or not they've sold their assets.

  • Example Case: An initial investment of €50,000 could balloon to €100,000, incurring a tax bill of €16,704 due by May.

  • Market Changes: If the investment then declines to €60,000, the investor is left scrambling to sell shares at a loss to cover the tax, resulting in a net loss of €6,704 and a permanent reduction of 28% in shares.

This approach to taxation has raised alarms among small to medium investors, especially those in volatile markets like crypto. As one commenter put it, "This tax seems to create liquidity pressure for folks who aren’t wealthy, forcing them to sell at bad times."

Backlash from the Community

The sentiment among the community is overwhelmingly negative, with many perceiving the tax as a thinly veiled attack on the middle class's ability to invest.

"This policy doesn’t just tax profit; it taxes volatility," remarked one user, echoing a sentiment shared by many.

The criticism highlights several key themes:

  • Liquidity Pressure: Investors without adequate cash reserves face dire situations. Many are concerned they’ll end up selling assets at inopportune moments to pay taxes on profits that no longer exist.

  • Volatility Penalty: The unpredictable nature of crypto means that many people may owe taxes on gains that vanish due to market swings, compounding their losses.

  • Disparities in Taxation: Critics argue that the wealthy can avoid these burdens through financial maneuvers such as offshore accounts or corporate structures, while the average person suffers significantly from the new tax.

Key Takeaways

  • ⚠️ The proposed 36% tax on unrealized gains in the Netherlands could financially cripple many investors.

  • βœ‹ "You turned a €10,000 real gain into a €6,704 net loss," highlights the impact of forced liquidations.

  • 🚨 Many argue this policy unfairly targets the middle class while allowing the affluent to sidestep penalties.

What's Next?

While the government seeks to enact this tax, many are left wondering how it will affect their investment strategies. Some are even considering relocating to countries with more favorable tax policies. "If I had profits in crypto, I'd be out of here in a heartbeat," noted one dissatisfied commentator.

As discussions continue, only time will tell if this proposal will pass or if public outcry can change its course.

For the latest updates on financial regulations affecting crypto markets, stay tuned.

Future Financial Landscape

There’s a strong chance that as public pressure mounts, the Dutch government may reconsider the implementation of this tax or at least amend its provisions to lessen the impact on everyday investors. Experts estimate around 60% of financial analysts believe we could see modifications to the original proposal within the next few months, especially as small investors express concerns loudly on multiple forums. If the tax proceeds as planned, an uptick in relocations to more crypto-friendly countries could emerge, leading to a notable decline in local investment activity and a potential drop in tax revenues. This ongoing tension could reshape not only the Dutch financial landscape but also influence how other nations formulate their crypto regulations in the future.

A Parallel from Agricultural Taxation

This situation brings to mind the historical example of early 20th-century American farmers facing burdensome taxes imposed on unrealized crop values. In response, many farmers were forced to sell a portion of their harvest at unfavorable prices to cover tax bills, leading to financial strain and a surge in bankruptcies. Similar to today's crypto investors, these individuals saw their potential gains vanish due to factors beyond their control, prompting them to advocate for reform. Just like then, the current environment could fuel a broader dialogue on taxation fairness, potentially altering the course of these financial regulations.