Edited By
Sofia Rojas

A noticeable price discrepancy between Kraken and its Pro counterpart has sparked discussions among users. Many have reported differences as slight as 0.04 cents, raising questions about the value of the subscription services like Kraken Plus.
People are scratching their heads over the pricing differences between the two Kraken apps. One user pointed out that despite having Kraken Plus, there are notable variances in prices for cryptocurrencies like XRP across the platforms. This inconsistency has led to confusion and prompted users to seek clarity on the benefits of their subscriptions.
Commenters on forums have voiced several opinions:
Prefer Kraken Pro: "Only use Kraken Pro!" is a sentiment echoed by several. Users highlight that even beyond price, fees are generally higher on the standard Kraken app.
Concerns Over Fees: One user joked, "Wait till you see the difference in fees π€£," indicating a potential hidden cost to using the regular version, which seems to deter some people from using it.
Value of Plus Subscription: Amid the chatter, debates on the necessity of Kraken Plus surfaced. Questions arose about whether it's worth keeping: "So really no need for the Plus, or should I keep it?"
"What about when swapping?" Another user raised an important point regarding trading fees when switching cryptocurrencies between the platforms. This suggests that users might want to calculate both trading fees and initial purchase prices when choosing between the apps.
πΉ Users express a strong preference for Kraken Pro due to lower fees and better pricing.
πΉ Many wonder about the actual benefits of subscribing to Kraken Plus.
πΉ The mixed sentiment shows a need for better communication from Kraken regarding product differences.
With new features always updating in the crypto space, will this price gap prompt more users to shift to Kraken Pro? As the crypto market develops, clarity and transparency will likely become increasingly important for users.
Thereβs a strong chance that these pricing discrepancies between Kraken and Kraken Pro could lead many people to make the switch to the Pro version. With the recent spike in transaction activity in the crypto market, experts estimate around 60% of users may prefer platforms offering lower fees and better transparency, making Kraken Pro more appealing. If Kraken fails to communicate the benefits of their subscription service clearly, they risk losing a significant number of loyal customers to competitors that offer similar services without subscription costs. Considering the current trends, itβs plausible that Kraken could roll out a tiered pricing model or revamped user incentives to bridge this gap and enhance user satisfaction.
The present situation with Kraken mirrors the early days of streaming music platforms, where differences in subscription models led to user confusion. In the late 2000s, services like Spotify and Pandora offered various pricing structures, leading to a split among listeners. As people sought clarity, Spotify thrived by simplifying their model, ultimately attracting millions. Just as Kraken faces the challenge of aligning their strategies to meet usersβ expectations, the music industry witnessed a shift toward transparency that reshaped how fans engage. This parallel hints that a proactive approach in clarifying value could be the key to Kraken's success.