Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Legal developments
/

Ceo of crypto.com demands investigation into $20 b liquidations

Crypto Chaos | CEO Demands Scrutiny on Exchanges After $20B Liquidations

By

Fatima Ahmed

Oct 12, 2025, 07:44 AM

Edited By

Aisha Malik

2 minutes needed to read

Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto.com, speaking at a conference urging for an investigation into trading practices after large liquidations.
popular

Kris Marszalek, CEO of Crypto.com, is urging regulators to probe exchanges following a staggering $20 billion in liquidations within 24 hours. His call comes amidst accusations of unfair practices and insufficient controls on trading platforms during the recent market crash.

Key Statements from Marszalek

In a Saturday post, Marszalek highlighted several critical questions regarding the exchanges' handling of trades:

"Did they slow down, misprice assets, or fail to maintain compliance during the crash?"

He called for an investigation into the exchanges with the highest liquidations, pushing for accountability and transparency in a tumultuous market.

Liquidation Breakdown

Recent data tallied by CoinGlass outlines the severity of the situation:

  • Hyperliquid topped the list with $8 billion in wiped-out positions

  • Bybit followed closely with $5 billion

  • Binance experienced $4 billion

Other platforms like OKX, HTX, and Gate fared better but still faced significant losses ranging from $264.5 million to $1 billion.

Community Reactions

User reactions on forums reflect a mix of skepticism and frustration:

  • One user questioned the motives behind the call for an investigation, stating, "Maybe China was the one who fked us over to get back at Trump this time."

  • Another argued, "Calling for investigations in THIS of all administrations is hilarious."

  • Despite the chaos, some noted that Binance managed to maintain functionality during the crash, earning them a degree of respect.

Sentiment Analysis

The atmosphere among the people reveals a blend of negative and neutral sentiment regarding the performance of exchanges:

  • πŸ”½ Many feel disadvantaged by the lack of transparency

  • πŸ’¬ "They’re the worst," criticized a user targeting specific platforms

  • πŸ“ˆ Some defended exchanges that remained operational during the downturn, indicating pockets of loyalty still exist

Key Insights

  • πŸ“Š Over $20 billion in liquidations pointed to severe market instability

  • βš–οΈ Calls for regulatory oversight reveal deeper concerns about trading practices

  • πŸ™‹β€β™‚οΈ Community discussions expose a divide between confidence in different platforms

In a climate where crypto volatility remains a hot topic, the stakes are clearly high for all involved. Will this call for scrutiny spark necessary changes within trading practices?

What Lies Ahead for Crypto Exchanges?

There’s a strong chance that Kris Marszalek's call for an investigation will trigger heightened regulatory scrutiny in the coming weeks. Experts estimate that up to 65% of trading platforms could face pressure to improve compliance and transparency. As scrutiny intensifies, exchanges might implement stricter protocols to prevent similar liquidations in the future. This could lead to a more stable, though less speculative, trading environment, as firms attempt to regain trust from both traders and regulators alike. If successful, these changes may pave the way for greater adoption and stability in the cryptocurrency market.

An Unlikely Reflection on the Gold Rush of the 1800s

Interestingly, the current situation in crypto resembles the chaos of the 1849 Gold Rush, where many rushed in with little understanding, leading to rampant speculation and exploitation. Just as miners faced harsh realities, today’s traders are grappling with similar volatility and uncertainty. The parallels serve to remind us that while opportunity exists, so too does risk in rapidly expanding markets. This echoes today’s need for due diligence and regulatory frameworks that protect individuals while fostering innovation, a lesson perhaps learned too late by those in the past.