
A controversial governance proposal is igniting debates among people involved with Cronos, aiming to transition from inflation-funded rewards to a revenue-backed model. Critics are raising serious concerns about the motivations and potential impacts of this shift.
The new governance proposal seeks to combat inflation issues by leveraging revenue generated within the Cronos ecosystem. However, critics argue that these inflation challenges are self-inflicted, stemming from excessive minting of CRO tokens, burdening a Strategic Reserve of 70 billion tokens.
βThe asset that caused the problem is being positioned as part of the solution,β noted one skeptical commenter, highlighting the irony at play here.
Confusion Over Corporate Structure: Many are puzzled about the separation between Cronos and CDC. One commentator pointed out, βCronos and CDC are different companies and have to be funded separately!β This confusion raises questions about the viability of the proposed revenue model.
Disillusionment with CRO: A growing sense of frustration is evident. One person stated, βI canβt get excited by CRO anymore; CDC really bent us over when they did the unburn.β This sentiment points to a broader loss of trust in the organization.
Skepticism Surrounding Revenue Projections: Concerns about how much revenue can realistically support the new rewards system persist, especially given the existing CRO pool. A participant remarked, βCryptocom could just buy CRO from the market with its profit to reward everyone.β
Doubts on Voting Power: Questions of governance transparency are surfacing. Another individual asked, βDoesn't the company own all of the voting power?β This query underscores a growing unease about community input in decision-making processes.
Overall frustration dominates reactions. One user expressed serious discontent:
"I fucking hate the disrespect the CDC social media manager shows for this community."
Another mentioned, βI barely use it; it probably amounts to 600 CRO per month in earnings.β This reevaluation of involvement reflects a broader skepticism regarding trust and engagement.
As this proposal unfolds, Cronos is facing significant challenges. Users are demanding clearer, more transparent data to maintain confidence in the platform. Experts worry that declining trust may ensue if leadership does not communicate effectively. Given past transitions, risking further disengagement seems like a real possibility.
π Shift to revenue generation model is underway
π΄ Critics highlight self-inflicted inflation issues
β Many question practical revenue projections
βοΈ Governance transparency and voting power are hot topics
π "Could the market/revenue be the key to recovery?"