Home
/
Investment strategies
/
Portfolio management
/

Finding the cheapest ways to set up liquidity pools

Affordable Liquidity Pools on Solana | Users Seek Cheaper Setup Options

By

Emilia Gomez

Jun 30, 2025, 10:31 PM

Edited By

Aisha Malik

2 minutes needed to read

A person calculating costs for setting up liquidity pools on a computer, with graphs and charts displayed.
popular

A growing number of liquidity providers on Solana are questioning the costs involved in setting up pools. After one provider reported a setup fee of around $50 for a Raydium v2 pool, many wonder if there are better options available.

Understanding the Momentum

Recent feedback from individuals experienced with liquidity pools highlights a divide in costs across different platforms. Sources from various forums indicate that while Raydium's fees can be substantial, certain tools on Solana offer more cost-effective solutions.

Main Insights from Reactions

  1. Alternative Solutions Exist: Commenters pointed out options like concentrated liquidity pools on platforms such as Meteora, Orca, and Raydium's AMMv4, which are either free or significantly cheaper than the reported setup cost.

  2. Standard Fees: Community members noted that about 0.3 SOL is a common fee when using the right tools, encompassing minting tokens and pairing setups. Several users emphasized that this approach often negates the need for a full Raydium setup for testing new projects.

  3. Simplifying Processes: One user highlighted utilizing a platform that allows for launching, trading, and wallet management all in one, suggesting that this can save both time and funds.

β€œ$50+ feels like a lot, especially if you’re just testing things or launching smaller tokens.”

The User Perspective

Users are expressing mixed sentiments about the costs associated with liquidity pool setups. Some are frustrated by the high fees, especially newcomers experimenting with smaller tokens. "Not exactly groundbreaking, but I’ve been looking for ways to keep costs down," one participant commented.

Key Points to Note

  • Costly Start: Initial reports show that $50 for a Raydium v2 setup is steep for developers just starting out.

  • Easier Alternatives: Players in the space are turning to lower-cost platforms for liquidity setup.

  • Community Support: Users are sharing their experiences and recommend tools to cut costs on forums and user boards, suggesting that collaboration can be key.

Moving Forward

As the sentiments develop, more users are encouraged to explore cost-effective solutions on Solana. The highlighted methods could spark greater participation in liquidity pools without hefty fees, reshaping how new tokens launch in this dynamic environment.

Future Cost Dynamics

There's a strong chance that as liquidity providers continue to share insights about affordable setups, more platforms will spring up to meet the demand for lower fees. Experts estimate around 60% of new developers may choose alternatives to Raydium, leading to increased competition and innovation within the Solana ecosystem. This shift could push established platforms to reevaluate their pricing structures, potentially resulting in a broader range of accessible options for newcomers while fostering a more vibrant trading environment. As costs decrease, we can expect greater participation in liquidity pools, enhancing the overall health of the crypto market and helping smaller projects find their footing.

Lessons from the Gaming Scene

The current situation bears a surprising resemblance to the early days of gaming consoles, where some players paid steep prices for premium systems while others thrived with more affordable, refurbished versions. Just as independent developers innovated to create engaging experiences at lower costs, crypto projects today are leaning into community knowledge to find ways to create liquidity pools that don’t break the bank. This evolution indicates that necessity often breeds ingenuity, and those willing to experiment with different tools may just find the next breakthrough solution.