Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Compliance guidelines
/

Will switching to hifo cost basis raise audit risks?

Changing Cost Basis Methods | Could Switching from FIFO to HIFO Trigger IRS Audits?

By

Maya Lopez

Mar 26, 2025, 07:10 PM

Edited By

Aisha Malik

2 minutes needed to read

A person contemplating the implications of switching from FIFO to HIFO for crypto taxation with visual graphs and data on a screen.

A rising tide of discussions among crypto traders is raising eyebrows as they question whether switching cost basis methods, specifically from FIFO to HIFO, could lead to increased audits by the IRS. With many concerned about compliance, the implications of such changes are hotly debated across various online communities.

In the 2025 tax season, some contributors notice a growing unease regarding shifting from the First-In-First-Out (FIFO) method to the Highest-In-First-Out (HIFO) approach. This transformation could change how gains and losses are calculated, which might catch the IRS's attention. "If they see a pattern, they’re more likely to flag it," shared an anonymous contributor, echoing concerns about compliance.

While the IRS requires taxpayers to report cost basis, acquisition date, sale price, and selling date through Form 8949, it remains unclear whether taxpayers must inform the agency when switching methods. Not all taxpayers see the change similarly; some feel it could, indeed, create complications down the road. As one user put it, β€œThere’s a lot to consider before making that leap.” The sentiments expressed in these discussions are mixedβ€”leaning more toward caution than reassurance.

Community Concerns & Insights
Many voices in these discussions boil down to three main themes:

  1. Report Requirements: Should the IRS be informed about changing cost basis methods?

  2. Audit Anxiety: Does the switch heighten the risk of an audit?

  3. Experience Variance: Individual tax experiences shape differing opinions on this subject.

Interestingly, an overwhelming number perceive any method change as potential bait for IRS scrutiny. Therefore, the sentiment in these online exchanges tilts more negative, with some noting, "It’s safer to stick with what's familiar."

"This isn’t just about saving money. It’s about avoiding the IRS at all costs!"

Final Thoughts on the Community Pulse
As users navigate this complex territory, questions about proper procedures loom large. The community stands at a crossroads, weighing risk versus reward in financial reporting. The discourse signifies a cautious but engaged collective, looking to protect their interests while embracing change.

Key Observations

  • ♻️ The shift from FIFO to HIFO may signal an increased audit risk.

  • ⚠️ Concerns about IRS notifications remain widespread but unclear.

  • πŸ—¨οΈ "Better safe than sorry” remains a prevalent mantra among users.

For more details on IRS regulations, check out their official website or visit Investopedia for a further breakdown on reporting requirements.