Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

Do canada's crypto regulations actually prevent scams?

Regulation in Canada | Does It Really Protect Against Crypto Scams?

By

Maximilian MΓΌller

Feb 20, 2026, 03:24 AM

Edited By

Priya Narayan

2 minutes needed to read

A person examining cryptocurrency options on a computer with warning signs about scams in the background.

A growing number of Canadians are questioning the effectiveness of strict crypto regulations. While designed to enhance consumer protection, many feel these measures lead to higher fees and fewer options in the crypto market.

The Regulation Debate

Since implementing stringent measures, Canada has seen the ban or restriction of several well-known exchanges, such as Binance and Bybit. This leaves people with limited access to various coins and services. Advocates for regulation argue that it protects individuals from scams, but many are skeptical.

"Regulation does nothing except limit access," one commenter observed, reflecting a sentiment shared widely on user boards.

Despite these regulations, scams continue to thrive. Stories about Canadians falling victim to fraud, including rug pulls and fake platforms, still dominate online discussions. This raises a pressing question: Are scammers simply finding ways to operate outside the regulated system?

The Impact of Regulations

Many Canadians feel the current rules have not reduced scam incidents. Several key points emerge from user feedback:

  • Higher Costs: People face elevated fees when accessing exchanges.

  • Limited Flexibility: Options for trading and staking are severely restricted compared to other countries.

  • Data Leaks: Incidents like the recent Sumsub breach have exposed personal information, increasing the risk of identity theft.

As one user pointed out, "We’re just accepting worse service and higher costs without any real safety benefits."

Constant Scams Amidst Legal Barriers

Regular reports of scams underline the ongoing issue. Romance scams involving crypto are proliferating, with many people still losing money.

While regulators justify these measures as protection against fraud, little evidence shows that Canada is outperforming nations with less strict regulations. Are Canadians truly safer, or are they just left with less effective options?

Key Points to Note

  • Restrictive Measures: Regulatory actions have led to fewer available services and exchanges

  • User Sentiment: Many people express frustration with high fees and limited options

  • Ongoing Fraud: Reports of scams persist, raising doubts about the effectiveness of regulations

Interestingly, Canadians are simultaneously experiencing both increased risks and limited security as a result of these regulatory frameworks. The discussion is ongoing, and for many, the quest for an effective solution continues.

Examining Future Trends

There’s a strong chance that as Canadians continue to express dissatisfaction, we may see calls for regulatory reforms gaining momentum in the coming months. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that the government will respond to growing public dissent with more flexible regulations. This could lead to increased competition among exchanges, ultimately lowering fees and revitalizing the market. Alternatively, if the current regulations persist, we might witness a rise in underground crypto activities, as people seek safer and more practical solutions outside traditional frameworks.

A Lesson from Prohibition

Looking back, the impacts of the Prohibition era in the 1920s serve as a noteworthy parallel. Just as the ban on alcohol led to a surge in underground speakeasies and organized crime, the strict crypto regulations could inadvertently foster a similar environment. People may turn to unregulated exchanges for access, leaving them vulnerable to scams, much like those who sought illegal liquor during Prohibition. This reflection prompts the question: could Canada’s attempts to protect its citizens end up creating a hidden landscape of risks, reminiscent of history repeating itself?