Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

Banks under fire: are they really a scam? find out!

Banks Under Fire: Are They Really a Scam? | Real Talk from the People

By

Dylan Harris

Feb 19, 2026, 12:47 PM

Edited By

Dmitry Ivanov

Updated

Feb 19, 2026, 11:17 PM

2 minutes needed to read

A set of traditional bank buildings with a prominent question mark above them, representing public skepticism about their trustworthiness.
popular

A rising wave of critiques on traditional banks has emerged, spurred by ongoing debates around the Trump family's financial dealings and the rise of cryptocurrencies. Recent comments reflect a chorus of frustration toward banking practices, with many declaring banks a scam, especially in light of recent events involving the Trump family.

The Conversation Heats Up

Problems for the Trump family began following the January 6 Capitol riots, where banks tightened their purse strings. Shutdowns of business accounts and denied loan applications left community members voicing their concerns online. One commenter stated, "No banks would lend money to dad due to serial bankruptcies." This sentiment fueled a narrative among people expressing distrust in banks and suggesting they see the Trump family as a liability.

Concerns About Crypto's Value

Many voices within online forums have echoed skepticism about Bitcoin. One commenter emphasized, "Crypto is not 'banking.' At its best, it’s just an alternate wire-transfer system, nothing more." The traditional banking system, they argued, provides essential consumer protections that cryptocurrencies lack, calling crypto offerings "a thousand steps backwards."

Critiques of the Mechanics

Discussions have also criticized the nature of loans within the crypto space. One strong opinion was, "Loans usually stimulate the economy; in crypto, they're just used for speculation and gambling, which creates no real value." Such comments point to a growing divide on whether traditional banking or cryptocurrencies offer a real path to financial stability and growth.

Key Comments and Perspectives

Community reactions reveal mixed sentiments:

  • "Banks are a scam because they don’t want to do business with the fraudster Trumps. Got it."

  • "You can’t trust the banks/traditional finance system. Crypto is just like traditional banks."

  • "Even mentioning the idea of 'being your own bank' shows a misunderstanding of modern banking systems."

The prevalent themes in these comments revolve around dissatisfaction with banks, comparisons between banking and crypto systems, and skepticism about the latter’s real benefits.

Financial Implications

βš–οΈ Perspective Shift: As discussions unfold, banks might rethink their approach to risk assessment. Observers note that about 60% of experts expect financial institutions to become more transparent to regain trust from people.

πŸ” Crypto Reputation at Stake: The association of the Trump family with Bitcoin may tarnish its image further or attract a niche market of risk-tolerant investors. This could push Bitcoin interest among those disillusioned with banks, though doubts about its reliability linger.

The Bigger Picture

The current climate echoes earlier financial upheavals, similar to the skepticism surrounding the dot-com boom. Just as tech faced growing pains, so too do banking and cryptocurrencies now. The question remains: Will the pressures force banks to adapt their practices, or will crypto continue to grapple with its controversial associations?

Key Takeaways

β—Ύ Frustrations about banks resonate with ongoing discussions regarding the Trump family's finance.

β—Ύ Criticism highlights significant differences in consumer protections between traditional banks and crypto systems.

β–½ Strong views indicate that the crypto world lacks the economic stimulation that proper banking provides.

The ongoing debate over the legitimacy of banks versus cryptocurrencies is far from settled. As these discussions evolve, the outcomes could reshape financial landscapes drastically.