Home
/
Regulatory news
/
Government policies
/

Australian regulator targets crypto in financial crime efforts

Australian Regulator Targets Crypto | Banks May Face Greater Scrutiny

By

Nina Petrova

Jul 18, 2025, 12:39 PM

Edited By

David Kim

Updated

Jul 19, 2025, 05:38 PM

2 minutes needed to read

An illustration of a magnifying glass over a Bitcoin symbol, representing scrutiny of cryptocurrency by Australia's financial regulator.
popular

Australia's financial intelligence agency is ramping up its focus on cryptocurrency as a key issue in the fight against financial crime. The Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (AUSTRAC) is set to implement major reforms, scrutinizing digital currency exchanges and virtual asset providers in response to perceived risks.

Context of the Situation

With compliance deadlines looming in 2026, officials are overhauling anti-money laundering (AML) laws for upwards of 80,000 businesses, encompassing sectors like real estate and accounting. Reactions within the industry are mixed, signaling potential complications in the future.

"Here we go again, crypto is always easy to blame," one commenter lamented.

Emerging Concerns from the Community

Recent comments highlight fresh concerns about the implications of these regulations:

  • Banks' Attitudes: There is worry that banks may tighten restrictions even further. One person remarked, "Banks already hate crypto there; this might make it worse!"

  • Perception of Risk: Some commenters question why crypto seems to be prioritized over other financial threats, with one user stating, "Really? They donโ€™t see any larger threat than crypto?"

  • Adverse Effects on Compliance: Many believe that the increased compliance costs may deter institutions from engaging with cryptocurrencies. A common sentiment is, "These tightened AML rules will affect institutional interest. Compliance should be easy and simple."

Industry Perspectives

Industry figures welcome the regulatory clarity but are vocal about the hurdles ahead. While some appreciate the structured oversight, others argue that the costs associated with compliance could deter smaller firms from competing effectively. A top comment noted, "This sets a dangerous precedent" regarding the future of regulatory frameworks.

Sentiment Patterns

Overall, sentiment towards the proposed regulations is mixed:

  • โ–ณ Positive Highlights: Some voices support oversight and clarity.

  • โ–ฝ Negative Insights: Significant concerns exist about compliance burdens impacting operations.

  • โ€ป Cautionary Notes: Comments reflect skepticism about the long-term effects on the crypto market.

Key Insights on Australiaโ€™s Crypto Landscape

As the regulatory environment transitions, there's a strong probability that financial institutions will distance themselves from crypto investments due to compliance challenges. Experts predict that more than half of small to midsize crypto entities could struggle to meet AML requirements without deep adjustments, leading to reduced market presence. Additionally, larger institutions may reconsider their risk assessments, potentially categorizing cryptocurrencies as high-risk ventures, which could eliminate partnerships with crypto firms.

Historical Lessons

Looking back, this scenario echoes the late 1990s dot-com bubble when emerging tech firms faced heavy scrutiny. Many startups struggled under regulatory pressure, leading to a consolidation in the tech industry. This current focus on cryptocurrency may unintentionally favor larger players who can manage compliance costs, leaving smaller innovators at risk of failing to compete.

For deeper insights on AML guidelines and regulatory shifts concerning crypto in Australia, check out the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre's website.